Online discussions brainstorm
Posted: 25 April 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: online feminism, polls 4 CommentsFAC has had a couple of online discussions recently, on topics that some of us feel passionately about, and disagree over. I’m really interested in people’s perspectives on how our interactions as a group are affected by the online tools we use. I’d love it if people would answer this completely unscientific poll.
As an aside, how gross is it that the company that provides the poll software is called ‘PollDaddy’?
On Porn… The Chicken and The Egg
Posted: 24 April 2012 Filed under: chicken and egg arguments, oppression, pornography, violence against women and girls | Tags: chicken and egg arguments, hatred, oppression, porn, resistance, women 10 CommentsQUESTION: Is it that watching misogynistic porn gradually makes men misogynists- makes them hate women? Or is it that men who already hate women seek out and enjoy misogynist porn? Or is it that watching misogynist porn simply allows men to feel the can express their misogyny openly?
Woman Police Sgt, Woman PCSO and Woman Magistrate Catch and Charge Cambridge Man
Posted: 19 April 2012 Filed under: Cambridge, police, prostitution, Women's Army, World's Oldest Profession | Tags: Cambridge, found guilty, prostitution, woman judges, women police officers Leave a commentThis is from the free local paper in Cambridge The News and Crier on 19/04/12:
Cambridge Pimps are Busted
Posted: 18 April 2012 Filed under: oppression, police, sexual violence, violence against women and girls, War, World's Oldest Profession | Tags: brothels, Cambridgeshire, oppression, pimping, police, prostitution, violence against women and girls 5 CommentsThis incredibly small piece is from the Cambridge free paper The News and Crier. Kudos to Cambridge Constabulary for busting the pimps. Shame on the legal system for the ridiculously light sentences.
The reporting leaves something to be desired too. Note how the men are never called pimps, although they clearly are. And the lack of coverage of this issue [this the only small piece in the paper which refers to this obviously quite far reaching investigation by the police] and the lack of outrage or condemnation of the pimping ring involved. One of these brothels was very close to where I live.
We don’t know what has happened to the prostituted women involved.
The Marriage Foundation: dodgy statistics and Victorian-era morality
Posted: 11 April 2012 Filed under: Anti-Woman, antifeminism, hilarious patriarchy 3 CommentsThe Marriage Foundation is a lobbying organisation that was recently created by Sir Paul Coleridge for £150,000 to “be a national champion for marriage, strengthening the institution for the benefit of children, adults and society as a whole”. [1] It’s based here in Cambridge, run out of the Jubilee Centre, which describes itself as “a Christian social reform organisation that offers a biblical perspective on issues and trends of relevance to the general public”. [2]
It’s tempting to just laugh at this – after all, if people want to “be a national champion for marriage” what’s the harm? It seems almost too funny and old-fashioned to take seriously. But scratch beneath the surface and you’ll find a dangerous ideology that’s being used to justify vicious attacks on women, on families, and on the working classes in general. The people pushing this ideology just happen to be rich, and linked to the Conservative Party.
The ideology behind the Marriage Foundation
Here it is, in point form:
-
The only morally correct type of family is a married heterosexual couple with the woman doing the bulk of the child-raising work. Every other kind of family is morally bad.
-
The most important and fundamental cause of all social problems is families that are morally bad, i.e. families that don’t fit the married heterosexual mould. People who are poor, homeless, unemployed, addicted to drugs, or criminal, are that way because of their own moral defectiveness, and specifically because they (or their parents) are not married.
-
Thus the way to solve all of society’s problems is to make everyone get married. Obviously.
These ideas are so ridiculous that I feel silly even writing about them, except that they are actually being used by the government to shape social policy. This is the ideology behind Daily Mail headlines about “scroungers” and “feral youths” and “Broken Britain” and “neighbours from hell”, although you won’t catch the luminaries behind the Marriage Foundation using such uncouth language. And this is the ideology the government uses to justify its vicious attacks on the welfare state. The lower classes don’t need decent schools or Sure-start centres, or affordable childcare, or housing, or money for the unemployed or for disabled people or for those whose jobs to not pay enough for them to live above the poverty level; no, they just need to get married.
Midwifery is the World’s Oldest Profession
Posted: 6 April 2012 Filed under: Animals, Birth, Midwifery, Pre-Patriarchy, Pregnancy, relationships, Sisterhood, Solidarity, World's Oldest Profession | Tags: animals, birth, bodies, doula, labour, midwifery, pregnancy, sisterhood Leave a commentDo 385,000 people really oppose gay marriage?
Posted: 4 April 2012 Filed under: Abortion, antifeminism, intersectionality, oppression, Right-Wing Conspiracy, Uncategorized 1 Comment“Poll reveals public unease about plans to redefine marriage” [1] reads the headline on a Christian online publication. This is certainly the impression the Coalition for Marriage has tried to create with their petition to deny gay couples the right to marry. This petition received a flurry of press attention, but does this translate to a real groundswell of grassroots support?
Ben Goldacre (of Bad Science fame) checked out the petition website and found it odd that there is so little information about who is behind it:
But who are the Coalition For Marriage? They don’t say.
The Coalition for Marriage is an umbrella group of individuals and organisations in the UK that support traditional marriage and oppose any plans to redefine it.
The Coalition is backed by politicians, lawyers, academics and religious leaders. It reaches out to people of all faiths and none, who believe that marriage is the most successful partnership in history and should not be redefined.
But I can’t find a list anywhere, in any of the coverage, press release, anything.
Googling the address: “C4M, 8 Marshalsea Road, London SE1 1HL” it looks like they are in the same building as the Christian Medical Fellowship and the Lawyers Christian Fellowship.
Why Don’t Women Identify as Oppressed? @ PinkVox
Posted: 3 April 2012 Filed under: feminism, language, oppression, Solidarity, subversion | Tags: Feminism, langauge, oppressed majority, oppression politics, patriarchy, solidarity, subversion, women Leave a commenthttp://pinkvox.com/why-dont-women-identify-as-oppressed/
As feminists, how should we organise?
Posted: 2 April 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized 1 CommentThis was the title of the discussion group we had last Wednesday, with a view to thinking about how we as FAC should structure our group. As I mentioned in the introduction to this discussion, this is something that people have spilled a lot of words trying to think about, as there are very vivid political implications – whose voices are heard and whose are silenced, for example. So no pressure, then! (I was facilitating). Read the rest of this entry »
You must be logged in to post a comment.